Two little kittens wanted the job so an election was held. It was close. Kitten A won the election by three votes. Suddenly, a voter member of the group spoke up. This member said the administrator cat had sent out a text messages or two telling the group to vote for Kitten A. The administrator who is feared by most, tampered with the election. Many were up in arms. Complaints were made but, as usual, the administrator cat got to do whatever it wanted to do.
The UFA committee was shocked beyond belief. They couldn't believe an administrator would toy with the election unless that administrator had something to gain by placing Kitten A on the board. They could not trust the election. A quick vote was held to remove Kiten A from the committee. A new representative will be chosen shortly. I have heard it will be Kitten B, the administrator cat's enemy.
Some say democracy is dead in Animal Land, dead because Kitten A is not being allowed to hold the seat it won. Others insist democracy is now being upheld as the evil administrator is not getting what was wanted. You decide. Who supports democracy and who supports tyranny?